I wouldn't answer your post if I were Ichneumon. If all you you can do is bring up one controversy out of all that he posted, then you've already lost the argument.
Throw out Archaeoperyx entirely if you want. The rest of the evidence still stands.
That's actually the only one I've looked at in any kind of depth at all. By "depth" I mean ten minutes of internet research...which is all it took to show the major problem with dating "transistional" fossils. BTW, did you know that Bill Clinton is married to a transistional fossil?
Throw out Archaeoperyx entirely if you want. The rest of the evidence still stands.
lol...that's pretty scientific. Throw out the evidence that doesn't agree with the conclusion you want to make. That's pretty handy.