Thank you for the research. FR beats Limbaugh by at least a year and I belive the Gorelick wall is about 3-4 years old on FR.
You're welcome. Now let's rehearse what I sent you in #44, since I see you've ignored that:
nonliberal: "Why wasn't this brought out immediately after 9-11? It was on FR a looooooong time ago and Limbaugh is just NOW picking up on it. The news about Gorelick ..."
Matchett-PI: "Foolish question and comments. You haven't been paying attention.
I of 42 transcripts from Rush's web site - 24/7 archives section - using the search word: GORELICK
See I Told You So (Shortly after 9/11)
Gorelick Wall Prevented Us from Foiling 9/11
August 9, 2005
RUSH: I want to take you back in time, not just to the 9/11 Committee hearings but shortly after 9/11 itself, when everybody was talking about, "Why didn't we connect the dot? Why didn't we connect the dots!" and I said, "You know why we didn't connect the dots -- meaning the FBI and the CIA, military intelligence, "Why couldn't we share information with each others? There's one reason. The Clinton administration -- and most importantly, Jamie Gorelick." Jamie Gorelick -- who was #2 at the justice department; she really ran the place while Janet Reno was the face of the justice department -- erected a wall, and because the Clinton administration determined that they were going to fight terrorism not as a war but as a legal matter, and they were going to use indictments, and they were going to use grand jury testimony to try to nail these people -- and, of course, grand jury testimony is, by law, confidential -- and so any information gathered by, say, the CIA or the FBI had to be turned over to justice, and when justice got it and took it to the grand jury, it became confidential, could not be shared with any of the other branches, and that's one of the reasons why we couldn't "connect the dots," because strategery that the Clinton administration used to fight terrorism -- when they cared about it. ...." [snip]
bttt