"Agreed. muslims may be evil, but they aren't stupid.
There are evil muslims, but you have presented no evidence that all muslims are evil. And you would be hard-pressed to present such evidence, because it's not true.
So you are a liar. "
Stupidity combined with a personal attack. Saying "muslims may be evil" is not conclusive. There is an article that's missing. Some, or All. You didn't ask, you assumed. I expect no better from you.
"Imagine, a muslim instigates a fight with you, but you go to jail because it's a hate crime.
Nope. That's not how hate crime laws work. Assault is still assault. Yet another non-fact to your credit. (And need we remind you what you said about people who have a tenuous grasp of facts?)"
A simple extension. Generally, when an altercation occurs, the root cause is unknown, unless there are plenty of unbiased witnesses. If the hate crime card is available, would you expect one of the participants not to play it? I guess someone as naieve as you would.
You're getting all emotional. Your gentle constitution can't handle such stress, you really should go rest.
Nice try, but in context you said conclusively that they're evil, just not stupid. Words have meaning, and your meaning was clear, not only from that one post but from the entire body of your posts on this thread. You are now a double liar.
A simple extension
A simple-minded extension, perhaps, but one that does not belong to the real world.