The election of '92 will remain one of the great mysteries of the 20th century. Bush 41 tanked. He gave up. He ran a sloppy, lackluster campaign. He refused to use specific ammunition he had about Bill Clinton. After all, Mia, the guy had been head of the CIA! Clinton left bloody fingerprints all over Arkansas, and Bush 41 didn't even challenge him on crime.
The question is always going to be, "What did Clinton have on him?" If this theory is not sustainable, what the heck theory is?!
But that's history. Here's what counts now. I think we had better not count on the common sense of the voters in knowing just what evil charlatans the Clintons are. They have heard it too long. They have heard too much. Plus, the MSM has always been able to make it look like the worst episodes in the Clintons' record are the wild ravings of right-wing fanatics. The truth about these people is so bad, no one believes it!
The visceral hatred the NYC intelligentsia has for the Republican Party is extreme. I believe it descends in a direct line from the 1930's Communist Party of their parents and grandparents. The fact, for example, that Hillary is a demonstrable anti-semite means nothing to them. What matters is that she is ideologically in tune and attuned to their extreme left-wing views. Politically correct means more than personally reprehensible.
So, I fear that even if Pirro has the guts to go for Hillary's jugular, she will serve the GOP well, but might not win the election.
The election of '92 will remain one of the great mysteries of the 20th century. Bush 41 tanked. He gave up. He ran a sloppy, lackluster campaign. He refused to use specific ammunition he had about Bill Clinton. After all, Mia, the guy had been head of the CIA! Clinton left bloody fingerprints all over Arkansas, and Bush 41 didn't even challenge him on crime.
The question is always going to be, "What did Clinton have on him?" If this theory is not sustainable, what the heck theory is?!
But that's history. Here's what counts now. I think we had better not count on the common sense of the voters in knowing just what evil charlatans the Clintons are. They have heard it too long. They have heard too much. Plus, the MSM has always been able to make it look like the worst episodes in the Clintons' record are the wild ravings of right-wing fanatics. The truth about these people is so bad, no one believes it!
The visceral hatred the NYC intelligentsia has for the Republican Party is extreme. I believe it descends in a direct line from the 1930's Communist Party of their parents and grandparents. The fact, for example, that Hillary is a demonstrable anti-semite means nothing to them. What matters is that she is ideologically in tune and attuned to their extreme left-wing views. Politically correct means more than personally reprehensible.
So, I fear that even if Pirro has the guts to go for Hillary's jugular, she will serve the GOP well, but might not win the election.
