Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare

Not relishing the thought but yes. If she were up against someone who opposed Stem Cell research or refused to disavow the anti-evolution crowd then yes... I know that bush opposed Stem Cell Research in '04 but I actually thought that he'd change positions after the election and even if he didn't, Iraq was the more important issue.

In '08, if it was someone like Brownback (and I think he could be a darkhorse for the GOP nomination) who opposes stem cell research and, most importantly, refuses to support evolution, then I probably couldn't vote for him.

It'd only be for 4 or 8 years... Not the end of the world.


63 posted on 07/31/2005 2:32:05 PM PDT by KMB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: KMB

"You'll do this and nothing else if I vote for you?"
'Yessssssss.'
"MMM.. Okay!"
'Your ssssssoul issssss mine!'
"What was that?"
'Oh.. nothing.'


64 posted on 07/31/2005 2:32:25 PM PDT by Darksheare ("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: KMB
As a matter of fact Bush was the 1st president to allow embryonic stem cell research to occur. (Something I disagree with him on.)

If embryonic stem cell research had any chance to be fruitful don't you think that the private sector would be knocking down the doors?

Do the research, adult stem cells have saved thousands of people in 56 different clinical treatments. Embryonic stem cells have 0 treatments.

69 posted on 07/31/2005 2:36:41 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: KMB
It'd only be for 4 or 8 years... Not the end of the world.

Another four years of the Clinton gang would be an unmitigated disaster for this country.

Look at what happened in just President Clinton's first four years, or what happened in President Carter's single term.

129 posted on 07/31/2005 3:16:20 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: KMB
So... You are what likes to be called a "fiscal conservative". To me, that is NOT a "conservative. because, "fiscal" conservatives say "I'm for smaller governmemt" Well.. ALL politicians will TAKE our money... SO... IMHO-- a so-called "fiscal" conservative" is nothing more than a LIBERAL..

You have already stated that you would support Hillary. Someone who would work to make it ILLEGAL to call Evil what it is(for example-- banning the Bible as "hate speech".) Now, I know, you will say"cant never happen"... Well, who would had thought, 20 years ago, that some places would ban the Boy Scouts, because they would not allow OPENLY GAY leaders? That is happening, now. As is the push to gay marriage.

So-- what it all comes down to is... you (and your "friends") object to us "social conservative Christians" I'll tell you-- without US, you would win NOTHING!!!!! If you want to think you came from an amoeba, then so be it, BUT DO NOT keep thinking you should have the right to teach our kind this!!!!!
461 posted on 08/01/2005 2:00:50 AM PDT by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson