Replies

Ah, you make my point for me. Your premise (that ID has to be wrong) determines your conclusion (that ID has to be wrong).

You go even further. Rather than examine the logic of your premise, you make a blanket statement that it not even logically correct.

Given your conclusions, it is obvious that you believe that the crevo debate is a binary one. Either evolution is correct or ID is. Sorry, but you miss the third point that both could be. The simple fact is that evolutionary science looks at evidence and comes to conclusions based on that. Any other conclusions not based on the available evidence is mere supposition and personal opinion. Amongst those conclusions which is mere supposition and personal opinion is the one that ID is wrong. In fact, as I've shown just from a logical perspective, there is much more evidence for ID than against it.