Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: donh
You tell me. They appear to fit the definition you just offered me.

We aren't the only ones debating it.

Traditionally, they've been separate species. In 1993, the Smithsonian and American Society of Mammalogists deemed dogs to be a subspecies of wolves.

309 posted on 07/23/2005 11:27:06 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
Traditionally, they've been separate species. In 1993, the Smithsonian and American Society of Mammalogists deemed dogs to be a subspecies of wolves.

Well, we know that can't be, because we don't have any intermediate fossil evidence of the transition from wolf to poodle.

311 posted on 07/23/2005 12:02:51 PM PDT by donh (qua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson