Are you still trying to justify your
LIE that
Antony Flew rejected evolution even though it is very clear that
he did no such thing? Or are you still trying to justify your lie that
you had never said anything about Antony Flew in the first place even though I just linked to a previous posting where you in fact did say something about him?
Or are you just here to reinforce my position that "creationist" is a synonym for "liar"?
Other creationists here: any of you want to try defending nmh's very clear denial of reality? Not gotten any takers thus far; it's like every creationist out there absolutely refuses to acknowledge dishonesty from their own side (with a very few known exceptions, none of whom called out nmh on his lies).