Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MacDorcha
OK, let me get this straight: A rat (or it's ancestors) diverging, and becoming a class of felines, and a class of rodents... contridicts TOE?

I'm not sure I get the question. Rats and cats, if you go back far enough, have a common ancestor. That ancestor, however, was neither a rat nor a cat. AFAIK, cats did not diverge from the rodent group (or vice versa).

So, how would you say that two carnivor mammals do not share the same lineage? And that mammals did not start out small, and "rat-sized"?

All those things are true- all mammals share a common lineage and they all come from small mammals. However, those original mammals weren't really cats, dogs or rodents.

140 posted on 07/06/2005 10:48:44 AM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman

OK, I'll allow that explanation. (again, Laymen's)

Lets go with... cat (earliest carnivores) to bear.


141 posted on 07/06/2005 10:52:14 AM PDT by MacDorcha (In Theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson