Replies

"The burden of proof that the data was used malignantly does not belong on the Republicans whose FBI files were invaded by Craig Livingstone; the burden of proof belongs on the whole Clinton White House, from the Clintons (both of them) down to the janitor. Any one of them could have abused that data; for staying in the Clinton White House after that affair was revealed and never resolved by prosecutions of known felonies everyone in the Clinton WH is tainted by Filegate....no one in the Clinton WH should be nominated for President of the United States. If Hillary wanted to be a viable candidate for national office, she should have left the Clinton White House when Filegate came down, and no prosecutions resulted.."

Leaving the clinton White House would have done nothing to cleanse missus clinton. She is mired in the muck of Filegate.(Nothing can render this... woman a viable candidate, in any case. Her 30-year career abusing women is an absolute disqualifier.)

Does any sentient being really believe that it wasn't hillary clinton--(hillary just happened to be an acquaintance of bouncer Craig Livingstone's mother)--who hired Craig Livingstone in the first place?

(We know hillary clinton hired Jamie Gorelick, the lynchpin in the filegate-clinton putsch- Gorelick Wall triple play, a scheme (see below) that would enable the clintons to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder. )

Missus clinton, with her fascistic mindset and methods, likely engineered the whole deal. Digging up dirt on her perceived enemies is standard operating procedure for the very paranoid missus clinton.

Reverse Gorelick

by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) thanx to Fixit for the audio
Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:

Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.
The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998

Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis.

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

Thank you!!!

I just finished Ed Klein's book. And now I understand why Hillary wants it to be untouchable.

He uses many of the earlier books written about Mrs. Clinton to write an expose' which highlights all her slights-of-hand that drove the Clinton administration into every available sewer, but still managed to leave her looking like a hapless victim.

I hated reading through all those old scandals and unsavory stories. But let's face it. It's Hillary's beavior in the first place that makes them unsavory, not Klein's writing.

Don't shoot the messenger!

Pinz

Leaving the clinton White House would have done nothing to cleanse missus clinton. She is mired in the muck of Filegate.(Nothing can render this... woman a viable candidate, in any case. Her 30-year career abusing women is an absolute disqualifier.)

Well look, I have scant doubt that Hillary hired Craig Livingstone personally, so don't go over the top trying to convince me. My point is that she did not in fact leave the WH over Filegate; she never would have. But the fact alone that she was and remained in the WH covering for Bill when that one scandal reeked to high heaven and no one went to jail for a thousand felonies, does in fact disqualify Hillary for public office if you are an honest, public-spirited voter.
The problem in opposing the Clintons has always been scandal overload. The risk is that you make everything important - and the mushy middle doesn't receive the message that any of it actually matters.