COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
Posted on 07/03/2005 10:46:16 AM PDT by Mia T
by Mia T, 7.3.05
And this is the case less because of the Klein book than because of hillary clinton's realtime reaction to it.
Old media have two choices--continue to play the access-journalism game and feed their own increasing irrelevance ... or band together to resist this sick, dangerous... person, end their 4th-estate malfeasance and protect the country from a second and likely fatal assault from this inept, corrupt, ruthless pair of egomaniacal demagogues.
Hillary clinton needs old media more than old media need hillary clinton.
Leni Riefenstahl was the film genius who outmaneuvered propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels to chronicle Hitler's 1934 Nuremberg rallies in perhaps the most notorious documentary ever filmed, Triumph of the Will. For sheer power, reach, and ruthlessness, however, the fascist Riefenstahl operation doesn't hold a candle to the Clinton agitprop machine...
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx. yes, I loved that review, 'wart' 'n' all. ;)
Thank you!!!
I just finished Ed Klein's book. And now I understand why Hillary wants it to be untouchable.
He uses many of the earlier books written about Mrs. Clinton to write an expose' which highlights all her slights-of-hand that drove the Clinton administration into every available sewer, but still managed to leave her looking like a hapless victim.
I hated reading through all those old scandals and unsavory stories. But let's face it. It's Hillary's beavior in the first place that makes them unsavory, not Klein's writing.
Don't shoot the messenger!
Pinz
In her own book liar HILLARY told the American Electorate that no one in her family would have anything to do with CLINTON, except Buddy the Dog, for months after CLINTON's TV Confession about MONICA. |
|
Seems Buddy's broad-mindedness may have been a hillary fabrication, too. Check out the photo and reportage, below.... |
|
HAPPAQUA, N.Y., Jan. 4 -- The clinton-PR-machine-generated report of the death of Buddy, the impeached ex-president's chocolate Labrador, raises more questions than it answers. The report states: "Buddy playfully took after a contractor leaving the Clinton home about noon and was struck by a sport utility vehicle on Route 117 at the bottom of Old House Lane...Neither Mr. Clinton nor Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton were [sic] home at the time. The only comment they will make on the matter is by way of a non-denial denial with Ruffian overtones issued by Mrs. Clinton's office: 'My best memory is that I did not have any involvement in that death.'"
The report fails to explain how Buddy was able to wrest from the strong arm of the Secret Service and negotiate the multimillion-dollar, taxpayer-financed retrofits that were installed to make the poorly located suburban house safe for the universally despised former first couple. The report also fails to include a timeline detailing the whereabouts of the clintons on the day of the death. The clinton report's indictment of a sport utility vehicle (SUV) has caused incipient whispers of a vast left-wing conspiracy and an ever-increasing pile of dead adverse clinton witnesses to fill the Senate cloakroom.
Buddy was a 1997 'gift' from a 'benefactor' who subscribed to the notion: "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog," particularly sage advice for a DC couple forever mired in scandal and antipathy. Whether Buddy also subscribed to that notion was questioned as recently as last January when he entangled himself in clinton's legs, dropping the impeached ex-president to the pavement; clinton insisted at the time that there was no malevolence involved, that they were simply playing a game of fetch. clinton refused to say who was doing the fetching. (For details, goto: BILL & HILL & BUDDY & HELEN, Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS)
The White House reported that the clintons' first First Pet, Socks, a cat, greeted the canine acquisition with "a hiss previously reserved only for Ken Starr." Because Buddy remained Socks' nemesis throughout the clinton dog days, Socks was eventually exiled to Virginia, to the suburban home of Betty Currie, former clinton subornee and sex scheduler. At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.
Buddy web sites quickly exploded throughout cyberspace. (Socks web sites, too, Socks would add.) Mrs. clinton, a long-time adherent of synergistic exploitation, "authored" an instant book about three groups favored for exploitation by the clintons: dogs, cats and children. "Dear Socks, Dear Buddy: Kids' Letters to the First Pets" was published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster.
Although Chappaqua locals share the national repugnance for the clintons, their feelings never spilled over to Buddy. "The big highlight for people was, 'I just saw Buddy,' never mind Mr. and Mrs. Clinton," said Christine Meyer, owner of Wags and Whiskers here. |
.
Over and Over again here on F/R..
The CLINTONS' famously staged...
'Dancing on the Beach' Event...
To show off CLINTON "Lovebirds"..
Set 2 weeks before KATHLYN WILLEY's...
Oval Office Sexual Abuse Appearance on '60 Minutes,'
Was fully exposed.
ED KLEIN re-exposes this CLINTON show in his new book. The L.A. Times' complicity in it, with their exclusive telephoto Front Page CLINTONS Dancing photo, is not further exposed in the book.
We Freepers always have here on F/R.
.
excellent, as usual. ;)
The clintons' sickening presence with Rev. Graham illustrates the lovely couple's "preying-praying" scheme: they plan to play the Christian Right like a fiddle. (Not unlike their manipulation of my Jewish brethren.)
Missus clinton plans to prey on their very religious underpinnings to 'encourage' those voters she cannot get to sit it out.
Yes, a lot does go on in this forum. :) Some darned fine people here.
Well look, I have scant doubt that Hillary hired Craig Livingstone personally, so don't go over the top trying to convince me. My point is that she did not in fact leave the WH over Filegate; she never would have. But the fact alone that she was and remained in the WH covering for Bill when that one scandal reeked to high heaven and no one went to jail for a thousand felonies, does in fact disqualify Hillary for public office if you are an honest, public-spirited voter.The problem in opposing the Clintons has always been scandal overload. The risk is that you make everything important - and the mushy middle doesn't receive the message that any of it actually matters.
.
1st Class Freepers for CLARITY =
The CLINTONS' current march to shut us down thru the F.E.C., and other avenues, before they can dare to hope to regain our Oval Office in a new Time of War
Only our own Freedom is now at stake as we Freedom-protecting Freepers stand on the Front Lines.
.
I agree with you about scandal overload, but your focus on the crook's immoral response to her own criminal act instead of the crime, itself, makes little sense to me.
I agree with you that Hillary almost certainly hired Craig Livingstone, and that Craig Livingstone wasn't acting on his own when he committed a thousand felonies and didn't go to jail for it. I agree with you on that. But the problem is the mushy middle who do not want to believe that. My point is that the fact that Hillary stayed in th Whte House when it was up to the rafters in the mire of Filegate. That is undeniable, and that alone should absolutely disqualify her for public office.
I'll be looking forward to you beating Hillary! about the head and shoulders with a blunt keyboard for the next, oh, 3 1/2 years or so (and hopefully you won't have to after that). You're a true patriot.
You are exactly right. That coupled with the "recent campaign finance reform" agenda. It is to shut us down. It's how CA got "captured". Through censorship and biased reporting by the MSM. If the socialists-R-US can shut down our freespeech, the other states won't have a clue as to how the socialists are laying their traps. Nor how to fight these. Those in other states also have marvelous council for CA'ers and those in other states on other issues. Dems know this. As long as we have the means to communicate with each other, the socialists are going to have a hard time finding money'd backers for the socialist agenda; and the sell-out of US Constitutional rights. Sure, the brawl is on, and it's now. I think we are going to win. The very censorship laws lib-dems wish to apply will adversely affect those of their own membership who are accustomed to saying whatever they want, whenever they want. They don't strike me as "ultra" excited by the lib-dem "censorship" via FEC and CFR. Excepting those already backed by "monied" interests.
I see your point, but it's like nailing a mass murderer for jaywalking, hardly a capital offense.... I doubt that it would convert any dems.
Moreover, your appeal to the left's ethical compass assumes that it has one.... I've seen little evidence that it does.
That's a face on a wart.
I love your imagery! Absolutely wonderful. ;)
And YOU the true patriot. thanx very much.
lol
.
Well done, Alia.
Thank you for your CLARITY.
For the...
Enemy is now Within...
and always has been.
.
Yes, Aloha Ronnie -- always has been. It's the same, ultimate battle. The enemy is NOW within. And he's gonna lose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
