Skip to comments.
"...The Martians In Our Movie Represent American Military Forces." (New Flick Anti-America PsyOps!)
GOP Vixen ^
| 6/24/2005
| Bridget Johnson
Posted on 06/24/2005 10:18:23 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
2
posted on
06/24/2005 10:19:47 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I hope this one dies an ignomineous death. If the story about one reviewer being able to see this movie is an indication, Spielberg might have a real turkey on his hands here.
3
posted on
06/24/2005 10:22:22 AM PDT
by
jayef
(e)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
There was a preview for War of the Worlds before Cindarella Man.
In one part Tom Cruise grabs his teenage sons arm and says, "I know you feel like you have to fight, but you don't!" while the kid yells something like, "I have to do something!"
That coupled with things like this made me decide to wait for the cable release to see this one.
4
posted on
06/24/2005 10:22:34 AM PDT
by
retrokitten
(www.takebackthememorial.org)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Two factors - the Tom Cruise / Scientology factor and the Batman factor - are going to sink this turkey. Think Godzilla.
5
posted on
06/24/2005 10:22:35 AM PDT
by
mbraynard
(Mustache Rides - Five Cents!)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
If its a good movie, its a good movie. But people in Hollywood are just a bunch of idiotic hippylibs.
6
posted on
06/24/2005 10:22:47 AM PDT
by
Right_at_RiceU
(You don't need a gun to kill hippies, just soap or work.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
These movies (Sith, War of the Worlds, etc) are just Rorschach tests for those who are hyper obsessed with politics.. They will see what they want in the movie..
This reminds me of the movie Harvey. If you start to see 6 foot tall rabbits everywhere, maybe you should ask why you are seeing things, not see the rabbit as some sort of sign..

What do you see?
1. A Fluffy Bunny
2. Spilled Ink
3. It's All Bush's Fault
7
posted on
06/24/2005 10:24:25 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: mnehrling
I see a flying winged cyclops chicken demon.
Must....seek.....professional...help
;)
8
posted on
06/24/2005 10:27:13 AM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(You make my heart glad by building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: jayef
9
posted on
06/24/2005 10:27:43 AM PDT
by
Dubyous
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
probably had something to with Sith losing pace to hit the $400 million mark, after those films were discovered to be loaded with lame partisan (poorly written) attacks? Lame stretch. Sith is making more than the last Star Wars and will end up being the #2 moneymaker in the series. Its falloff after the first week was because it made so much damned money in the opening week it could only go south. And I wish MY income were "losing pace" the way this one has.
WOTW is from Spielberg, so it should be no surprise to anyone it has a liberal point of view. So what? This boycotting due to political beliefs of people in a non-political context is silly. I want to see a movie, doesn't mean it's going to make me ever vote Democrat again. If you don't want to watch the products of liberals, throw out your TV and DVD player.
10
posted on
06/24/2005 10:28:08 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Don't suffer fools gladly? I don't suffer them at all.)
To: mnehrling
You said it. Just because Anakin Skywalker says "You are either with me...or you're my enemy." who says that's supposed to have some real world analog we should all be familiar with? Some people look too deeply.
11
posted on
06/24/2005 10:29:22 AM PDT
by
Dubyous
To: mnehrling
Of course, when the writer of said flick actually states, boldly, that the Martians in our movie represent American military forces invading the Iraqis"... you've then inarguably shot allllllllll the way past "Rorschach test" territory, and straightaway into the dreadlands of Naked, Self-Confessed Political Propaganda... :)
12
posted on
06/24/2005 10:30:01 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: Dubyous
Almost every leader at one time or another has said this.. it is a common literary phrase from the ancient Greek plays to Shakespeare, to modern cinema- long before President Bush.
13
posted on
06/24/2005 10:30:59 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I have a problem with the fact that 'according to a reader at....'...
Remember a lot on the left said that they heard Spielberg said that Sith was about Bush.. which he never did (and completely denies..)
14
posted on
06/24/2005 10:32:31 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I guess I'm a sucker.. Tom Cruise or not, I've been a WOTW fan since I heard the original broadcast by Orson Wells. I still have a copy of it.
I'll go sit in the theater and watch it and then form my own opinion as to whether it was a boondoggle or not. :)
15
posted on
06/24/2005 10:38:37 AM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Movies by liberals provide excellent incite into their faulty thinking. They think they are exposing conservatives faults in their films, they just don't realise they are exposing their own faults. The problem is that the way they see things and interpret them is so backwards that conservatives don't see it the way they do.
Case in point with Cruise telling the son he doesn't have to fight. It should go without saying, conservatives always teach that fighting is a possible first response but let's make sure its what we need to do first. If facts reveal that a fight is necessary, do it right, get it done. The liberals may think they have exposed conservatives as fight first, think later because of the scene in the movie - conservatives see a father asking a son to think first, get a better weapon and then kick b*tt.
Who cares what some liberal claims it means, that is his opinion and doesn't necessarily even portray that thought.
16
posted on
06/24/2005 10:41:16 AM PDT
by
UseYourHead
(Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
To: mnehrling
... and it's always possible you may well have something there, of course. (Seriously; no sarcasm whatsoever.)
Givrn, however, that Spielberg was the "point man" for John and TerAYza Kerry's Hollywood fundraising efforts; and given his current bitterness over the results of the 2004 elections... I think I'm going to wait for the early reports from my fellow FReepers on this one, nonetheless.
Heck... it's not as if I wouldn't just go back and see Batman Begins a second time, anyway... :)
17
posted on
06/24/2005 10:42:39 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: mnehrling
Oops! Make that:
"Heck... it's not as if I wouldn't just AS SOON go back and see Batman Begins a second time, anyway... :)"
18
posted on
06/24/2005 10:44:12 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: Dubyous
Movie attendance is at its lowest in almost 20 years. Here's more reason to find something else to do on Friday or Saturday night.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Mr. "Chill Wind" Robbins is in this movie as well. No Tim Robbins movies for me, ever again.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson