[1 spark]

More on this letter here:

http://www.republicanandproud.com/frighteningmessage.htm

[softwarecreator]

Didn't we see something that looked just looked like this letter posted earlier in the day?

[1 spark]

a good read for you.

[Eastbound]

True, perhaps, but it has the flavor of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," which is still being debated as authentic.

I wonder why they would 'in your face' this at this time, unless they were already prepared for a world-wide move. If not, it doesn't make sense to rile the natives while we have the capability to short-circuit the whole plan.

[coconutt2000]

Our children will immigrate from Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Indonesia and even from India to the US and to the other Western countries.

And we will infect your children with the spirit of Freedom and Liberty, and most of them will join us against your insane jihad against rational civilization.

In the struggle for the hearts and minds of the majority, Freedom and Liberty will always prevail.

[RAY]

They just haven't fully awakened the giant! They haven't made us rednecks mad enough yet - but they will. When the rednecks really get mad, the intellectual weenies and bleeding hearts will just stand around chattering, wring their hands and p*ss & mo*n.

They Islamic world is not fooling us – they are all the same. The common man doesn’t trust any of them and never will.

Its simple, anytime someone's social/religious/civil interest is opposed to yours, they are a danger - stay on guard and don't be afraid to strike.

We may not be “intellectual”, but our instincts are good and we really are not as stupid as some think.

[Dominic Harr]

Great letter -- but I just can't find it in me to be scared.

Their whole plan is to make enough crazy stupid people to overwhelm us?

In my opinion, there's a big disconnect about what it takes to 'win' a conflict. Our opponents in this conflict don't seem to know the first thing about the history of warfare. Terrorists kill some people with car bombs nearly every day. But is that, historically, a 'successful' action?

An offensive action is only successful if it siezes some resource -- a strategic stronghold, or a power plant, or oil fields. Many times thru history, one side in a war makes an assault on a position, manages to a great kill ratio, but fails to take the position. That is called a military failure.

Just because they're killing more than they're losing in these 'attacks' doesn't make them successful in war. It could help them 'attrit' us, if they can kill more soldiers than the we can replace. But their kill rate is far, far below that. Heck, more people are killed/wounded in automobiles in the US than in this 'war' in Iraq.

It's a classic, "win the battles, lose the war" situation.

[caver]

The letter is a complete synopsis of everything I learned here on Free Republic.

[Eagle of Liberty]

May they gather in large crowds as they chant:

Allah-hu-Ak.......BOOOOOM!!!!!

[sauropod]

read later

[processing please hold]

I hope they can dodge a speeding bullet coming out of a 30.06 at maximum velocity.