Posted on 05/27/2005 5:23:14 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Apparently PepsiCo's President and CFO, Indra Nooyi, thinks the USA is giving "the finger" to all the world. That's right, she was heard to claim that the USA is flipping the bird to every other nation on earth in a commencement address she gave to the graduates of Columbia Business School on May 15th.
All commencement speakers have the singular problem of finding a way to give their address a "hook", a way to grab the audience. Indra Nooyi chose as her "hook" an analogy of the five fingers of the hand as representing the five major continents. With apologies to Australia and Antarctica (the hand only has five fingers, she helpfully reminds us) Nooyi delved into the topic of international business to enlighten the graduates. With her "hand" analogy, she identified Africa as the economically small little finger, Asia as the powerful thumb, South America as the ring finger of love, and Europe as that wonderful index finger that "pointed the way for western civilization and the laws we use in conducting global business."
That leaves the USA to be assigned a digit, doesn't it? If you were counting fingers that also leaves only one finger left. And you guessed it. Nooyi identified the USA with the middle finger. She said, "if used inappropriately - just like the USA itself - the middle finger can convey a negative message and get us in trouble."
She went on to say that she felt that "this is how the rest of the world looks at the U.S. right now. Not as part of the hand - giving strength and purpose to the rest of the fingers - but, instead, scratching our nose and sending a far different signal." In other words, she sees the USA as giving the world the extended middle finger. Not in utter defiance, mind you, but in a more subtle and sneaky way by pretending to scratch our noses and pointing that bad finger forward when we think no one is looking for that is exactly what her allusion to the scratching of the nose means. Sneaky. Hateful. Ignorant Americans.
She goes on to regale her captive audience with the story of some obnoxious, drunken American businessmen she witnessed in a Chinese hotel loudly making fun of the bathroom facilities in their rooms. If you were not aware, in the Far East, the traditional toilet facilities consist of a hole in the floor over which the user squats in use. These businessmen were gauche enough to forget that many of the hotel staff spoke English quite well and understood every loud and intemperate word spoken by those boorish men. A bad example of the "ugly American" I would have to agree.
OK. Point taken. But, do a handful of drunken loudmouths automatically represent ALL of the USA? If that is true, then wouldn't English football toughs represent ALL of England? Wouldn't every surly waiter in every bad French bistro be the perfect example of all Frenchmen? I don¹t think so. These businessmen were jerks, to be sure, but to equate these fools with all Americans? Rather simple minded, isn¹t it?
But, here is a further and more important point. While Indra Nooyi stood at that podium and wagged her finger at the petulant American business community, while she bemoaned American etiquette while abroad she used the vulgar example of "the middle finger" in her analogy. So, we are to understand that, to Indra, it is a "bad" thing that some loud American businessmen got rowdy in China and perhaps embarrassed themselves and their hosts. Certainly to any level headed person it was horrible behavior exhibited by the overheard businessmen. But she, with her tsk-tsking, can stoop to a vulgar analogy and that is apparently just fine. Their vulgarity is bad, yet hers is excusable?
Why is she any "better" than those she berates, one might ask?
Further, as the CFO of one of the USA's biggest corporations, she seems to feel it perfectly fine to represent the citizens of the USA as ignorant cretins. In this time when the slightest off color story or ill feeling about America sends its detractors into paroxysms of hatred, riots and anger, she saw no problem with denigrating the country that pays her extravagant salary.
A close read of her address reveals some rather prosaic, but good points about the business community and how it would benefit the USA for its business representatives to act when abroad. Much of what she said would have been quite fine. But a commencement address should be an uplifting experience for the listener. And equating the USA to the extended middle finger brings her address down into the partisan mud slinging and ignorant, uncouth behavior that she seems to decry.
And while she was spending so much time berating the American business community, she offered not a single example of what her adopted country (Indra was born in India) does well, or the good things it offers the world. Not a mention of the higher standard of living the USA has helped the rest of the world enjoy was intoned. Not a peep did she utter about the Tsunami relief or the many billions of dollars US businesses donate to charitable causes worldwide. Not a mention of the millions that have been set upon the path to freedom by US efforts was offered.
In short, her little tirade seemed to be solely an excuse to berate the country that has made her life and that of so many billions of people around the world so rich.
She ended her speech with this:
"So, remember, when you extend your arm to colleagues and peoples from other countries, make sure that you're giving a hand - not the finger."
I have to say that I have decided that I will be extending my arm from this point forward. It will be to pick up a Coca Cola Product and not a Pepsi product all the while thinking of Indra Nooyi.
(Update- PepsiCo has offered an "apology" that isn't quite one.)
"this is how the rest of the world looks at the U.S. right now. Not as part of the hand - giving strength and purpose to the rest of the fingers - but, instead, scratching our nose and sending a far different signal." In other words, she sees the USA as giving the world the extended middle finger.
"how the rest of the world looks at" does not imply "she sees the USA as giving the world the .... finger". It means, "the world sees the USA as giving the world the finger.
These businessmen were jerks, to be sure, but to equate these fools with all Americans?
Another false charge: Nooyi says explicitly that the FEW give a bad rep to the many: "Truth be told, the behaviors of a few sully the perception for all of us"
It was a poorly conceived speech, but this is an even more poorly written and ignorant essay.
The Asian prick who runs the Liquor Store on Spring Street, NYC, the same who today handed the money I gave to him back to me in change, so I think, out of his contempt for non-Asians, or that I was not a big spender - God only knows.
I took our money to his neighbor, and bought that expensive Pomegranite mouthwash to chase the half pint of vodka I require to cope with the ride from NYC to Brooklyn on the subway.
My point is that when I walk into one of these stores, there is no end to the stuff one may choose to drink. No end, despite the heavy advertisments.
This just shows you how ignorant these folks are.
I would never - ever - give the UK the big bird.
LVM
This makes me extra glad I own Coca Cola stock.
If a Chinese hotel wants to be considered world class, it better have world class amenities. If my company were paying $300 a night for me to stay in a hotel in Beijing, I ought to be able to expect a toilet similar to one I would find in a hotel in New York, London, or Tokyo.
This makes me extra glad I own Coca Cola stock.
If you own any mutual funds, chances are you own a little Pepsi, too.
Yes, Victor Davis Hanson has an excellent article in
today's NRO on that very subject. It's ironic that so
many people who demonstrate in their personal success
the greatness of our system are the first to show their
contempt for it. But I suppose it's partly an attempt to
grandstand their guilt and show the other poor slobs
that they have a social conscience -- or perhaps they plan
to run for office or support some other demagogic agenda
that will gain them notoriety.
Cr@p, I don't like Coke products, but I disdain traitors to this country even more. Where's Joan Crawford when you need her?!?!
Boy, you are desperate!
Thanks, VDH gives a much more reasonable take on the speech, although he doesn't really go into it that much.
Bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.