[Nathan Zachary]

Science is how we establish proper theories, is it not? The more science we can gather to prove a theory, the stronger it becomes. In Science, a good theory becomes a formula, which we then use to examine other theories.

That's why the evolution theories suck. They lack solid scientific formula's to prove them. As far as theories go, they are way down at the bottom of the scale. Carbon dating for example, is a flawed theory; the formula requires an unproven assumption to make it work. I think we will see it become rejected completely in the near future.

[politicket]

Science is how we establish proper theories, is it not?

A hypothesis requires three things to become a valid theory (think of it as the three legs of a stool - without one, the stool topples).

1. Observability
2. Repeatability
3. Verifiability

Macro evolution is simply a hypothesis. It fails the test of a theory.