Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Before you boycott Pepsi
tatter and ashes ^ | 5-19-05 | Sharpink

Posted on 05/19/2005 7:56:58 PM PDT by sharpink

In the meantime Hugh Hewitt and his audience (of which I am a loyal part) launched a boycott of PepsiCo. Through Hugh and the Blogs, enough pressure was put on Pepsi that Nooyi issued two apologies, both of which Hugh declared insufficient and unacceptable.

I urge you to read the statement in its entirety and complete context. When you read this put it in its proper context. Is it really deserving of outrage and a boycott? In my opinion the statements don’t stack up against those of Ward Churchill, Eason Jordon or almost any statement made by New York Senator Chuck Schumer. Use a little perspective and a little common sense in your appraisal.

(Excerpt) Read more at tattersandashes.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Politics
KEYWORDS: bootnooyi; indranooyi; pepsico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: sharpink

I read the whole statement and you are wrong. Do you work for Pepsi or own a lot of Pepsi stock or something??


21 posted on 05/21/2005 5:14:12 AM PDT by Horn_Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Horn_Dude
I don't think I have any Pepsi stock. I have about $1000 dollars in a 401k. I also in no way work for Pepsi.

This boycott just rubs me wrong way. It reminds me of some of Jesse Jacksons Rainbow coalition shakedowns. I get ticked when I see Conservatives adopt the tacticts of the humor and joyless left.
22 posted on 05/21/2005 4:01:11 PM PDT by sharpink (righting wrongs real or imagined)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sharpink

"Yet to see us frequently stub our fingers on the international business and political stage is deeply troubling."

The Pepsi President was clearly taking a swipe at US policies and not just the business people. It seems pretty stupid for the head of a company that relies on the US consumer to do such a thing. I don't have any idea why the head of a corporation wants to interject politics into their speeches… maybe it is similar to the artist or movie star that uses their microphone they were given because of an unrelated talent to try to influence politics. Make a political statement and 50% of the people are going to disagree with you. Many will choose not to buy your product. Why someone that is responsible for selling a product would complain about the politics of half of the population is beyond me but I suspect it is pure ego.

I don’t particularly like boycotts and won’t participate in this one. I do enjoy watching these people sweat it out though. If I were the chairman of the board of a company my first rule to officers in my company would be the “shut your mouth” about politics. Go become a politician if you want to talk politics (or go start your own private company) but as long as you are given a microphone while the head of this company, shut up. It can only hurt business.


23 posted on 05/22/2005 11:50:36 AM PDT by Combat Override Button
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson