Posted on 05/16/2005 9:45:47 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
AND THEN REALITY BEGAN
I don’t have time to watch television during the week so I TIVO my son’s choices that we watch on the weekend night which works best. He asks questions, has a very sharp memory, and uses all information to his best advantage (much like my wife). Most of the shows he enjoys are competitive and we are more often predicting losers rather than the winner/s. Until the ending segments of most popular multi-participation the bet is on who will be eliminated.
As I considered this I recognized the reality of media and the repercussions henceforth. Suddenly the general public was not interested in general media. Circulation cuts affected everyone, everywhere. All of a sudden the game shows on television were/are authentic. Tom DeLay is a criminal. Judge Brown is a racist. Hillary has no reason to participate in trial. Social Security is being obstructed by the right-wing. Our Constitution evolves, there is no reason not to know what other countries are doing. Newsweek just admitted to fabricating a story and provoking riots around the world.
The liberals are turning against their beloved minorities. They are desecrating religion. They are promoting taxes of every sort. They want to socialize anything imaginable yet refuse to put their "ideas" on paper.
We are back to these shows trying to knock a player off, the competition and the strategy. How does anyone benefit when liberals shut down ideas or media firewalls the public with anything but the left’s interests? How do we address their incessant attempts to intervene in foreign affairs? Why do we want to govern by another country’s laws?... When will the public awake to the strategy and competition of this game?
Thanks for sTROLLING in!
What a patently absurd insinuation on your part. Nobody in the entire free world - and I mean NOBODY! - think it's all roses in Afghanistan.
I sure hope you come up to speed soon, or you won't last long around here. But welcome to the forum anyway.
You need to check your sources. FR welcomes dissenting opinion. That's what we're about. But you'd better become more educated if you intend to throw out silly accusations such as above or the Iraq War claim. Why don't you start again and help l'il ol' me out? Clarify the Iraq War rationale which was - to put it kindly - inaccurate.
I was told FReep doesn't take kindly to dissenting opinion. Looking forward to a lively exchange of ideas.
When are you going to begin self-evaluation?
You, like liberals and media, continue to evade unsuitable facts (see above again). Although neither the media nor the left remembers 12/16/98, Clinton (D) ordered was ""to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs, and its military capacity to threaten their neighbors. Their purpose is to protect the national interests of the United States". Just a month later he cited aggressive action necessary for "An offensive biological warfare capability, notably 5,000 gallons of botulinum, 2,000 gallons of anthrax, 25 biological-filled scud warheads, and 157 aerial bombs..." He had full support from party members then who are defying actions Bush took. I have the text of Clinton's speeches... The real question is not only what did the liberals know in 1998 that they "forgot" a few years later, but what about the media?
This is the same "crew" which supported Social Security reform about the same time only to again "forget" that when Bush entered office (I have that information as well if necessary).
This blog provides people such as you with the same, just another time. Once again here we go out with a fact in another attempt to hide something else. Media circulation is down the tubes, that's hidden. National television news is no longer watched, FOX sucks. Liberals are a growing minority, minorities rule. People are unwilling to allow this kind of crap to destroy our nation.
Then we have the inspectors who were banished from the country, those guys "largely successful in neutralizing Saddam's threat". What kind of difference did that make?
Why aren't publications such as Newsweek wrong to print crap like that and place our country in a precarious position? Why are these same sources not wrong to lie about other aspects of war which essentially accomplish similar objectives?
Who told you we don't allow dissent here? Your "people?" Why would you discuss your plans to register as a Freeper with anyone in the 1st place?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.