Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2005 8:27:10 AM PDT by LW McMurray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LW McMurray
Many previous studies have demonstrated that human beings view the most absolutely average people as being the most attractive.

Give a normal curve and you'll always have ugly people with which to contend.

2 posted on 05/03/2005 8:35:15 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LW McMurray
"The question," he said, "is whether ugly people have fewer offspring than handsome people. I doubt it very much. If the number of offspring are the same for these two categories, there's absolutely no evolutionary reason for parents to invest less in ugly kids."......this is the where evoltionary argument is going.....

Whether or not evolution is true (and I don't believe it is), why does he doubt that ugly people have fewer offspring than handsome people? Statistically, it's probably a given that in today's society ugly people have difficulty finding mates and getting married. This should, in the long run, translate into fewer offspring...
3 posted on 05/03/2005 9:11:01 AM PDT by Old_Mil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LW McMurray

Maybe ugly parents are less attentive parents.


5 posted on 05/03/2005 10:50:32 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LW McMurray

They say that the children were "ugly" and then they blame the child's ugliness for the parental lack of affection? Seems to me that the parents are far uglier than any of these poor little children.


7 posted on 05/03/2005 11:36:29 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson