OK, so let me see if I understand...somebody posted on DU that somebody else posted in the comment section of a blog that they talked to somebody else who told them (while dialing for $) that Kerry was still working on "gathering" proof the election was stolen. So we also have to believe this person on the other end of the phone, whose job is soliciting donations, is also high enough in the Kerry organization that he/she would be privy to information about a "secret" investigation. And that this Kerry funds solicitor, calling for a completely different reason, would decide that in spite of the need for total secrecy they can trust this ONE anonymous person with this information. Not only that, but this Kerry worker would know about and share specific information about paperless voting machines and vote tabulators with A COMPLETE STRANGER! And that a junior senator from Mass. would have the resources, power and influence to bully other states and conduct a private investigation into a federal crime, especially in light of the fact that ALL evidence of fraud so far points to the dem. side. Well if there's THAT much proof it must be true.
OTOH, these are the same people that thought a gay reporter with a nom de plume who wrote articles slanted in favor of the Bush administration had somehow committed a crime on the level of Watergate. Maybe it was more like the moonbat being solicited for funds went off on a tangent about the "stolen election" and the Kerry worker trying to appease the moonbat mumbled something about Kerry being aware of "problems" with the last election, his deep concern about election fraud and making sure all elections had a paper trail. Then our little moonbat, hearing what he/she wanted to hear promptly posted this supposedly priveleged and secret information on the internet. This led, naturally, to wild fantasies and utterly absurd speculation on DU. The 2004 election is a gift that just keeps on giving.
Cindie
Exactly.