Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
I have spent the last 25 years consulting for architects as a structural engineer, and I have found most architects to be lacking in common sense, unable to manage their projects and notoriously deficient in business and money management, especially being able to pay me for my services. The patron saint of architects, Frank Lloyd Wright, was the epitome of these qualities. His prairie houses had flat roofs, and leaked like sieves. "Fallingwater" was structurally defective and has had to be repaired to prevent its collapse. He was bankrupt or nearly bankrupt throughout his career, despite obtaining huge fees for his work. And he left his wife and 3 young children for some hussy and ran off to Europe with her. I can count the number of truly capable architects I have worked with on one and a half hands, out of hundreds.
2 posted on 04/15/2005 1:20:14 AM PDT by KAUAIBOUND (Hawaii - a Socialist paradise for left-wing cockroaches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KAUAIBOUND

Since you are a structural engineer you understand strength of materials, normal modes, static and dynamic loading and all that, but try to explain it to the aesthetacist that builds around human requirements of form and function. Telling Frank that he might need a brace across that nice south facing window might cramp his style.


4 posted on 04/15/2005 1:47:51 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: KAUAIBOUND
Of course, there are good modernist buildings -- that is, there have been modernist designers gifted enough to produce admirable work despite the questionable theories to which they subscribed. I would rank Louis I. Kahn and Frank Lloyd Wright among them.

I agree with you- the low rise, flat roof style that FLW inspired was a bad idea. The fellow who wrote the above must like wet buildings.

5 posted on 04/15/2005 3:44:25 AM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: KAUAIBOUND; Lorianne

When I was a math graduate student in the early 1970's we used to see a lot of aspiring architects flunk out of the engineering calculus sequence (mostly taught by senior faculty, but with lots of grad students to staff the recitation sections and grade the exams). About the only more innumerate population of students in the introductory math courses were the arrogant loud mouths from the School of Journalism: invincibly ignorant.

Maybe we didn't flunk enough of them, but at least some artsy types who couldn't calculate a stress load got filtered out by this requirement.


6 posted on 04/15/2005 3:46:25 AM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: KAUAIBOUND

I agree that FLW is vastly over-rated as an architect. I had the misfortune to take a tour of one of his 'Prarie Homes' one evening during a period of warmish weather. The house was stuffy, the furniture awkward, uncomfortable and impossible to move. As an engineer, it always puzzled me how he (along with Mies and countless others) could be labeled as great architects when they violated basic engineering principles, structurally unsound, and totally unliveable.


12 posted on 04/15/2005 4:51:51 AM PDT by NHResident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson