You blind idiot! Terri was not dying at all. She was healthy! She was not on life support. She was not in a coma! There was no proof she wanted This terrible death. Hearsay is not proof in any court of law. Her loving parents wanted her. She was denied therapy. Her husband wanted her dead for his own selfish reasons.
Robertpaulsen obviously doesn't concern himself with the truth.
All true except the "healthy" part (and the blind idiot part. I can see.). I would not describe someone with liquid slush for a cerebral cortex as "healthy".
Not on life support? Well, if she was not on life support then certainly you didn't mind when they pulled the feeding tube. I mean, it's not as though, according to you, the feeding tube was providing life support. Correct?
"There was no proof she wanted This terrible death."
She sure as heck didn't want this terrible life. Judge Greer had "clear and convincing" evidence that Terri did not want to live that way.
"Hearsay is not proof in any court of law."
Bzzzzzzt! Wrong.
The Florida supreme Court in their 1990 Browning decision requires that oral evidence of oral statements be permitted to count in court.
"Her loving parents wanted her."
You know what? If they truly loved Terri, they would have honored her wishes.
Her husband wanted her dead for his own selfish reasons."
Her husband could have taken his $400,000 loss of consortium award, turned Terri over to "her loving parents" (who were loving the $800,000 trust fund, the greedy slimeballs), and gone on with his life.
He chose, instead, to stay to carry out her wishes.
Alllllrighty then.
And her death was perfectly legal. Given the nod by severall state and federal courts.