I read Judge Greer's court order dated February, 2000. He had "clear and convincing" evidence as to her wishes as required by Florida law.
And is it your legal opinion that her "husband's" statement seven years after her collapse was that she wouldn't want to receive food and water through a feeding tube? Did Terri indeed wish to be starved and dehydrated to death? Do you really believe that was "clear and convincing evidence" under Florida law?
How many legs would a normal horse have, if Judge Greer called a tail a leg?
I finally read the February 2000 order today. Without getting dragged down into the details of the case, I was expecting it to be a more rigorous review of the law and testimony. I'm no lawyer but I thought it was at the level of what a first year law student could crank out on an overnight case study assignment.