Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mercy
Most of the really old Christian edifices are built right on top of Greek and Roman pagan temples.

Is that what you mean?

Or do you have the idea that the Muslims somehow desecrated Temple Mount and the Hebrew Temple when they built a couple of mosques?

If so, remember that the Romans totally destroyed the whole of the Temple. The Temple Mount was yet another structure provided by Herod to support the Temple known in a lot of literature as "Herod's Temple".

After the Romans cleared the site it remained vacant and open to the elements for a long time ~ some attempts were made over the years to fix up the place, and even in the three years of Simon Bar Kokhba's rule, work was done. Of course, right after that the Romans completely razed the city of Jerusalem to the ground and built a Roman town on top of it.

The Eastern Romans did some improvements to Jerusalem and built several churches (which are still thee). Then the Dark Ages came, construction stopped, and Jerusalem dwindled to a small town (if that). Eventually it drew the attention of the Islamic Caliphate. Temple Mount was cleared of debris and two mosques were built, one of them on top of the stone that stood immediately under the Altar, and where Muslim tradition holds that Mohammad's horse leaped, with him, into Heaven.

So, how did Islam desecrate the site? Seems to me that shame belongs strictly to the Romans.

96 posted on 04/03/2005 9:59:28 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
When I count what one religion does to another I only count 'World Religions'. Sorry that's just a justified prejudice of mine. Pagan and animist cults don't count in my world. Ancient history.

As to Mt Moriah: The Dome of the Rock was built where it is to cuckold the Jews. You will never convince me otherwise. Mohammad never even made it to Jerusalem.

The Muslim religion is one of conquest and subjugation. Judaism was never hegeministic. Christianity has been used so but this is not biblical. It is evangelistic but does not subvert culture or enslave minds.

Christian Evangelism is only a matter of spiritual conversion not a political tool. To use it thus is wrong and against Biblical teaching ... just the reverse of Mohammedanism.
104 posted on 04/03/2005 10:22:04 AM PDT by mercy (never again a patsy for Bill Gates - spyware and viri free for over a year now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson