PS - If the "law" permits the court to explicitly prohibit a mother and father from giving their daughter, who is guilty of no crime, a drink of water or a spoon of nutrition, do you think it should be obeyed?
How would you like to be "permitted" into a room to see your disabled daughter condemned to die a slow agonizing death but "prohibited" from giving her the basic human care we would not keep from an animal or, even for that matter, a condemned mass murdered?
This is the "rule of law" to you?