To: WBurgVACon
I thought the extra scrutiny was in the form of sex offender notices? I guess, they should either be executed, or never released from prison.
49 posted on
03/29/2005 11:47:56 AM PST by
stuartcr
To: stuartcr
I guess, they should either be executed, or never released from prison. Fine by me...
50 posted on
03/29/2005 11:50:49 AM PST by
WBurgVACon
(Proud member Tau Kappa Epsilon - along with Ronald Regan)
To: stuartcr
I thought the extra scrutiny was in the form of sex offender notices? I guess, they should either be executed, or never released from prison.The recividism rate for these evildoers is damn near 100% (I've heard law enforcement officers make some gallows-humor remarks to the effect of child molestors being "Six Sigma-compliant," because they are 99.9999% likely to re-offend).
I prefer execution, myself. Saves money on warehousing the worthless f***s.
77 posted on
03/29/2005 1:28:29 PM PST by
Poohbah
(If it's called "collateral damage," how come I can't use it to secure a loan?)
To: stuartcr
I guess, they should either be executed, or never released from prison. Either one is fine with me. Both prevent a repeat which is the best deterrence.
101 posted on
03/29/2005 9:21:13 PM PST by
Netizen
(USA - Land of the free, home of the brave, where the handicapped are legally starved and dehydrated!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson