To: Jim 0216
"Terri has expressed that she doesn't want to be kept alive artificially."
And we know this because?......Aw yes, her husband, and apparently her husband's brother now, claims she said so. Staking this case on the statement of a husband who now has a common law wife(Bigamist-which is against the law) and two children is a weak case at best.....in my humble opinion.
34 posted on
03/23/2005 1:15:09 PM PST by
This Just In
((In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king))
To: This Just In
Such an expression should be in writing, as in a living will. The default should be in favor of life. Also, feed someone is not keeping them alive "artificially".
36 posted on
03/23/2005 1:19:18 PM PST by
Jim W N
To: This Just In
common law wife(Bigamist-which is against the law
I do not believe that Florida recognizes common law marriage. Therefore he is not a bigamist, nor does living with another woman, regardless of the moral implications, make him a criminal.
62 posted on
03/23/2005 2:05:39 PM PST by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green is made of liberals...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson