Should you wish to circumvent the discussion, by all means do so.
The point is that the governor has not stormed the hospice care provider in Largo and taken custody of Terri.
The question is ... why not?
What on earth are you talking about? circumvent?
Again, you bolded the article's statement that the judiciary is in contradiction with the executive/legislature. You asked me, of all people, what the legislature has done about it. I told you. They passed a law explicitly endorsing the notion of the Governor of Florida ordering her life saved by executive order. That's the answer. That doesn't "circumvent" your question, it answers it, unless your question had some subtle meaning I am missing.
The point is that the governor has not stormed the hospice care provider in Largo and taken custody of Terri.
That is true. Wow, good point!
um, that's what the article is saying. That the governor has the power to save her life, and should, but is not. We all agree about that, then, apparently.
The question is ... why not?
I dunno. He's afeard, I reckon.
Any other questions?