We are all going to die. And in every case it will be tragic and a loss, but to circumvent hundreds of years of the rule of law for one case is not proper.
We are all going to die, but we are all not going to be starved to death.
"hundreds of years of the rule of law "
just WHO is voilating hundreds of years of the rule of law, if not the judges in this case?
Active euthanasia is not even legal. Terri's "consent" is a legal fiction, to give cover to the advance of the euthanasia movement.
Well said. Thanks
31Then Pilate said to them, "You take Him and judge Him according to your law."Therefore the Jews said to him, "It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death," 32that the saying of Jesus might be fulfilled which He spoke, signifying by what death He would die.
Jesus broke no Roman law, yet was put to death in order to honor hundreds of years of the rule of law according to the Jews.