Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th

Clinton did it after a court told him he could. Bush would be doing it after a court told the parents that the removal of the tube is lawful. He would be taking a big risk legally, and would definitely take a beating for months in the press for doing this. It would look heavy handed. That said, maybe he should do it anyway if it saves a life.


212 posted on 03/23/2005 7:48:51 AM PST by Defiant (Make unconstitutional rulings unconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant
That said, maybe he should do it anyway if it saves a life.

I agree.

219 posted on 03/23/2005 7:55:18 AM PST by Lady Eileen (God Save Terri. God Save America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

To: Defiant

I repeat: W said "It is always better to err on the side of life." Guess he doesn't really mean it.


253 posted on 03/23/2005 8:28:45 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson