Posted on 03/22/2005 4:35:16 PM PST by FR_addict
What does this mean? What kind of drugs would they give her? I would hope they would at least be humane enough to be giving her some morphine for pain.
Wow, something big is going on here, like a huge coverup.
According to her own affidavit and many other sources, her name is Carla Sauer Iyer. On what basis do you assert differently?
Nope, didn't see the interview. I assume it was verification of her affidavit?
The nurse in this thread was a guest on Hannity's radio show at ~5:30 ET today. Iyer was on at 5 PM.
No, she's not an employee, she's an agency nurse. Agency nures are the medical equivalent of temps.
Or they could overdose her on morphine.
The CEO of the Hospice chain is also involved in Euthanasia organizations -- at least I saw that one thread. I would have to find her name and do more research. I will try to quiz some pro-life ties who know much about Euthanasia.
I don't think Felos is involved except through his ties through Euthanasia organizations. He might know the CEO of the chain of hospices that Woodside is part of through the Euthanasia organizations -- but I have no factual information. Just what I remember on some thread on Terri on Freerepublic [and there are thousands of posts].
she still has to be at least an LPN to perform nursing functions
Is she able to get ice chips? That's not food or a tube!
Just looked at the transcript from Fox and Friends this morning....it's Carla Sauer Iyer
You are so far behind the curve I haven't the time or energy to bring you up to date. Sorry.
If you should wish, look at ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1367833/posts
And run down the posts.
You'll see.
When I was in the ER last month for my broken arm, I was asked specifically if they could release information about me. Before I said yes, I asked them about it. If I said 'no,' they couldn't even acknowledge I was a patient. And that was to anyone, including family members. If doctors and other hospital staff are discussing patient conditions, they have to have permission from the patient or a person authorized by the patient to grant that permission. that's why I'm concerned.
Did you hear what she had to say?
Please see post #33.
Actually, I'm ahead of you, I read that before you posted. It appears that at some point she married and her name changed from Carla Ann Sauer to Carla Sauer Iyer. How is this material in any way and deserving of h1 tags as if I missed some crucial, case-breaking piece of evidence?
What does it matter if she's called Carla Ann Sauer or Carla Sauer Iyer?
Is she Iyer again, or is she , as her licence says, Sauer?
Why confuse things with facts.
The jury will disregard that remark
I just did. You and steveb challenged the authenticity of her affidavit on the basis of the notary -- your challenge was rebuffed, the issue was explained, it is a valid affidavit according to what I read on those threads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.