"With an attitude such as yours it is no wonder you get banned."
Neither the FR or ST want to ban anyone, they do so for 'cause'. As I have said, they both have a perfectly legitimate right to ban anyone for any reason they choose. My OBSERVATION is that the FR bans in order to reduce the amount of asked-and-answered rhetoric which the Left (in general) uses to actually spam the site; an attempt to sabotage the site and make it not understandable, meaningless. In the case of ST, I KNOW they ban for mere convenience and to save 'face', and not to save their site's forum from being damaged by spam.
And, if you read the threads on ST (and which I provided links to, above, in another post) you will observe that they, also, complain about my 'attitude' and that that is the reason for the ban. Funny, isn't it? You're in the wrong forum! You should be over there at ST agreeing with them that they AREN'T hypocrites for banning posters while they revile FR for doing just exactly that! You can join their 'group' and make me the subject of conversation (so you can avoid that you are a hypocritical moron). After all, it is every bit of it all about me and my attitude, right?
"I happen to agree with your observation of hypocrisy. I believe others here have already addressed that. Why beat a dead horse? Oh, I get it. You are looking for sympathy. Well, look up sympathy in the dictionary. You will find it is listed between sh!t and syphilis. Get my drift?"
You may say that it is all about *me* as many times as you care to expend the effort to do, but really it is about their use of banning at the same time they defame others of banning. I am an example of that hypocrisy on their part, since I was banned from the site. How can I support my contention in opposition to their calumny, without mentioning that example? Yet, you (in a very leftist technique) spin that into my seeking "sympathy". You are a regular little propagandist, aren't you? Spin-spin-spin, and there I am -- a disreputable sympathy geek who makes himself into the subject of conversation and tricking people into ad hominem attacks (who cares what he originally wrote his opinion concerning). . .What a joke! What irony! What a dunce!
I wrote: "Attack you? Where did I do that?"
"Post 32 by tadowe: It will replace any need for you to actually use any of your own intellectual capacity -- just post the "picture" and your thoughts and mental abilities will become obvious to ANYONE who notices"
More unreality! It is a challenge, not an insult. However, if I see another jpg from you in this thread -- I will know that you are a victim of child psychology and actually pretty stupid. . .
"I was merely replying to a humorous post by Zacs Mom. If you will back up a few posts, you will find I never posted to you, I was replying to Zacs Mom. You stuck your nose in it and insulted me. Now you want to play the victim. Go play with yourself!"
Excuses!!! Poor you! You must be devastated and that's why you are continuing to make a fool out of yourself by making me the subject.
HEY! ANYONE? Can we get a little 'sympathy' for Allo's being insulted? He would appreciate some jpg's erasing his neo-bête noire, the more violently the better!