Replies

"If you're so unhappy laddy, do everyone a favor and just *GTFO*, got it?"
Funny! You're the one expending the effort to express just what an "unhappy laddy" you happen to be. Why don't you just not read this thread, yourself?

So let's review, first you start this vanity thread of yours where you're bitching and whining about how 'unfair' Jim Robinson is, you OBVIOUSLY want people to read it (why else would you post it, ya moron?), and then when you get pounded for your puerile sputtering, you say 'why don't you just not read this thread?'

LMAO! I'll go you one more, why don't you just refrain from POSTING such drivel?!?

And I'm quite happy, thank you very much!

Why don't you go to sierratimes and post about how much you agree with their hypocrisy and what a dufus I am? They will literally LOVE you there! There's the ticket! Go!

Hey tadpole, I like it right here at FR, I don't NEED to go to 'sierratimes', and you've already proven that you're a freakin dufus, so in effect, 'my work is done'.

I reiterate: you don't like it here, wave buh-bye, quit wasting bandwidth, and SCRAM!

(WHERE do these chowderheads COME from?!?!)

". . .first you start this vanity thread of yours where you're bitching and whining about how 'unfair' Jim Robinson is, you OBVIOUSLY want people to read it (why else would you post it, ya moron?), and then when you get pounded for your puerile sputtering, you say 'why don't you just not read this thread?'"

A miss! I am criticising Sierratimes (ST) and the Sagebrush Saloon (SS -- and how appropriate is that?) for their hypocrisy in reviling the Free Republic (FR) for banning posters. As I mentioned, that is their right -- for both FR and ST/SS. However, I can NOTICE! I can provide the example of ME (having been banned from ST/SS) as someone banned by them! It isn't "whining", per se, but rather it is commenting on the reality. I'm actually quite pleased that they (ST/SS) AGAIN demonstrate their hypocrisy with me as their target -- I don't mind the ban at all. . .

"LMAO! I'll go you one more, why don't you just refrain from POSTING such drivel?!?"

Why don't you avoid "drivel" and not become excited when someone makes a comment (you obviously misunderstood!)?

(The rest of your own "drivel" deleted because you made a mistake. . .)

"(WHERE do these chowderheads COME from?!?!)"

It should be pointed out Tadowe was actually defending FR, kinda. He is pointing out ST and their hypocrisy banning members who don't agree with them.. Unfortunately he didn't do in such a way as to make others understand that is what he was doing.

Tadowe: "They couldn't STAND to have a conservative on their tyrannical little "case". . .

However, they picked the wrong "troll", even if I do say so myself. . ."

A little too "self appointed important" wouldn't you say? However you have to agree he has a point.