To: Hi Heels
Hi, again:
"It was not a clear post. My humble opinion was that we may have misfired. Many agree. Many disagree. Make the post more clear next time and you won't be flamed. Then put some ice on it."
Once again, I am not your willing subject for discussion. Each time you attempt that, I will reply.
Your 'opinion' is NOT 'humble'. Got that? Don't lie with cliches. Got that?
You are arrogantly continuing to make me the subject by criticising me for YOUR misunderstanding. Got that?
Go point your finger in the mirror, Ms. Humble. . .
191 posted on
03/23/2005 11:01:45 PM PST by
tadowe
To: tadowe
I do think posting the criticism of FR here is old news ..
There are special anti FR sites..There are special places on some forums set aside to criticize FR and JR..I read one occasionally for laughs..
It is nothing new and certainly the hypocrisy, handwringing or jealousy is nothing new.
Banned FR posters are particularly prone to this phenomenon. They always find a home and some are banned and must move on again..
I won't be posting on Sierra Times..I won't be reading the Sierra Times..I imagine after this thread dies..I will not think about Sierra Times at all..
192 posted on
03/24/2005 5:05:58 AM PST by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: tadowe
Pretty sure you know where to put YOUR finger.
196 posted on
03/24/2005 9:12:58 AM PST by
Hi Heels
(Now Andy, I ain't got time for them trivial trivialities...Barney Fife)
To: tadowe
197 posted on
03/24/2005 9:23:24 AM PST by
Hi Heels
(Now Andy, I ain't got time for them trivial trivialities...Barney Fife)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson