You might be right, CG. After settling down and reading the entire thread including ZM's post, I'm thinking he was fired upon without review (so many trolls, so little time, dontcha know), but poster made two errors. One, not a clear post. Can't tell who's side he's on, who he's defending, who he's attacking, or even what point he making. Two. Hostile. Immediately everyone who disagreed with him is stupid, fake conservative, socialist, blah blah blah.....rant rave, yada yada. Brings people's fists up. IMHO.
Zot him.
"Two. Hostile. Immediately everyone who disagreed with him is stupid, fake conservative, socialist, blah blah blah.....rant rave, yada yada. Brings people's fists up. IMHO."
I assume he will go to another site and be equally shocked at another banning. First he makes a post with an inflammatory title..then lambasts everyone for not reading his post #1 and misunderstanding him..
Newbies do not have a track record and should know better than to attack those who do.
Had he calmly accepted he's made a mistake not putting a barf alert in the title..all would have been worked out.
I first thought he was the writer of the article,too.
I have an idea this post was more about his being banned there than their hypocrisy about FR's banning posters..
"It's all about meeeee!"
Hi, Hi,
". . .but poster made two errors. One, not a clear post. Can't tell who's side he's on, who he's defending, who he's attacking, or even what point he making. Two. Hostile. Immediately everyone who disagreed with him is stupid, fake conservative, socialist, blah blah blah.....rant rave, yada yada. Brings people's fists up. IMHO."
What a joke! No one has "disagreed" with the subject of the thread! Instead, and like you, they attempt to patronize the 'messenger' and, in their misunderstanding, act out as a "gang" who high-five and congratulate each the other in what a fine jpg was included in the rant they post OFF SUBJECT.
And. . .your 'opinion' is very 'humble'. . .