Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: repinwi

Well, at least Judge Whittemore is asking for the Schindlers' attorney (and the DOJ) to provide arguments to back up the constitutionality of the statute instead of just declaring it unconstitutional from the start. Please keep Gibbs in your prayers...I'm sure he's typing on a computer right now and suffering from extreme sleep deprivation.


8 posted on 03/21/2005 6:41:26 PM PST by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hispanichoosier

Well said.


99 posted on 03/21/2005 7:09:49 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: hispanichoosier
Well, at least Judge Whittemore is asking for the Schindlers' attorney (and the DOJ) to provide arguments to back up the constitutionality of the statute instead of just declaring it unconstitutional from the start.

He assumed the law to be constitutional from the very beginning of his first order, dismissing constitutionality arguments. I think he's only doing this to stop MS's legal maneuvering about constitutionality.

I see a lot of people wishing he had a heart, but the law doesn't have a heart, and he appears to be following it quite strictly. As I've said, where's an activist judge when you need one.

382 posted on 03/25/2005 11:57:48 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson