[Andy from Beaverton]

[eddie willers]

What a lousy article.

Would have been better if written by a man.


:o)

[LibFreeOrDie]

So according to Katha, now blogging is sexist.

Maybe if she stopped writing for that pinko rag "The Nation" she'd have time to start her own blog, and she'd be more appealing to op-ed page editors who might hire her.

Here we go, another round of quotas.

[SteveMcKing]

Nobody has any reason to complain whatsoever. If you wish to be in technology, you may.

Other factors besides your own will and ability - or lack of - are nobody's concern, especially not the government's.

[RichInOC]

Michael Kinsley? Courtly? Hah. I'm pretty sure Susan Estrich v. Mike Kinsley qualifies as a catfight.

[solitas]

Susan Storm-Richards - the original Invisible Woman

[EGPWS]

After all, anyone can have a blog, right?

Let's hope so, and if not, then what is the reasoning?

[LibFreeOrDie]

What she's REALLY ticked off about is that the male bloggers apparently don't link to women bloggers enough. Nothing is stopping the women bloggers from likewise ignoring male bloggers. They can do a cyber-Lysistrata!

Katha, if the boys won't let you into their clubhouse, build your own. Get Hillary and her millionaire friends to buy a newspaper for you.

[Bernard]

Are there more women or conservatives contributing to the Los Angeles Times?

[spodefly]

A court ordered affirmative action plan for female pundits is needed to offset this egregious patriarchal domination of the punditry arts. Perhaps in 20 years or so, when the playing field has been levelled and all males have been resocialized through court-mandated diversity training, we can permit the demographics of punditry to return to a meritocracy.