I posed a hypothetical situation to frame a question. I also clarified that I'm not very familiar with the case. Under the basis of my hypothetical situation, which seems plausible, he is fighting to fulfill his promise to the woman he loved, spending all that money to fulfill her wishes when he could have left her to fate and lived comfortably off of the malpractice award. Additionally, he's possibly trying to continue living himself, possibly even at her request. I hope for your sake that you are loved so well that your mate would so dedicate themselves to a promise to you.
Of course, perhaps this isn't the case here, but I haven't heard the contrary.
Let's see. Michael testified tearfully at the malpractice trial that all he wanted was to "take care of" Terri for the rest of her life. The rest of her life wasn't long, was it?
Also, he has a defacto wife and two children. So much for marriage vows.
No, my husband will NEVER 'love' me in this way