[Bigh4u2]

And while the appeal is on going, then what?

If a judge sentences someone to be put to death immediately that hasn't committed a crime, and refuses to issue a stay order for an appeal, should that judges sentence be carried out?

It the person is dead, what good is an appeal?

No.

Sometimes you must resist the court in order to preserve justice.

[sinkspur]

If a judge sentences someone to be put to death immediately that hasn't committed a crime, and refuses to issue a stay order for an appeal, should that judges sentence be carried out?

The average length of time from death penalty verdict to actual execution is over 15 years!

Try another example.

[txrangerette]

In a life and death case, and one which will establish a precedent for starvation Euthansia based on hearsay evidence, such as this case, your logic is inescapable. To sit by and allow this corrupt judge to put her to death and in this heinous manner, simply because he is a judge and you are in the legislative or executive branch, would be very, very wrong.

An appeals court? They are not there to look at the facts of the case, but must rely on Greer's "facts" which are almost all lies. Plus, in FL, they are all in on it together in the judiciary. That is a sad, simple fact that will soon lead to the excruciating suffering and death of someone who is not even PVS.

[PhilDragoo]

Federalist 78 Hamilton is eight pages of which Keyes deems the following crucial in the extant matter:

Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The executive not only dispenses the honors but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.

I submit it is impossible for Hamilton to have foreseen the Soup Nazi refusing to allow DCF its sixty days to investigate abuse--while not examining the glaring fact that Terri Schindler-Schiavo was improperly placed in hospice without the required doctor's signature, without fulfilling the requirement of being terminal, i.e., having six months to live;

That Greer has received campaign contributions from Felos the Hemlock Society member, author of a soon-as-Terri's-dead-to-be-published book on "euthanasia", that Felos was on the board of this hospice (being billed for 15 million in Medicare fraud);

That Gus Bilikaris donated to Greer's campaign and gave Felos the legislative cover;

That Michael Schiavo will cremate Terri, thus tampering with further evidence of abuse caused by him, by Felos, and others at their instruction;

That when faced with judicial tyranny threatening imminent wrongful death, executive action is warranted.

There is nothing--nothing--to cause the death of Terri Schiavo except the unbridled ruthlessness of George W. Greer.

Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and George W. Greer are liable under RICO as coconspirators in criminal activity, namely, murder, abuse, fraud in the amount of millions of dollars of taxpayer monies.

Schiavo Attorney Felos No Stranger To Medicare Fraud
http://www.theempirejournal.com/0311051_schiavo_attorney_felos_n.htm