Posted on 03/03/2005 2:40:55 AM PST by MisterRepublican
Ho hum. Another day another New York Times poll showing the President's poll numbers in the crapper. Geez, if you only read the NYT you would wonder how George Bush got elected dog catcher, let alone President. Look, we don't doubt it's been a tough week or two for the President on Social Security, but there's no way in hell it's as bad as this across the board on all issues like foreign policy and Iraq.
You're telling me people favor the Democrats 51-30% on Social Security? No way, no how. There's no way you can tell me that while 55% of people say Social Security needs to be fixed now, nearly that same percentage trusts a party to solve it considering that not only have Democrats offered nothing in the way of a solution, but even deny a problem exists in the first place.
But that's why you have us. Remember way back in March of last year when we exposed fraudulent media polls? The same holds true for this one. Keep in mind the poll was conducted of ADULTS only, not likely voters, or even "registered" voters - plus the party ID breakdown is 36-29 in favor of the Democrats Umm perhaps the NYT didn't get the memo that in the 2004 elections, party ID was evenly split at 37% each. Funny, isn't it, how the results of this poll just happen to comport with what the MSM has been printing in their "news" sections the past few days. And just take a look at the "random" people they chose to quote in the story.
This poll stinks from the neck down folks.
Slimes asks loaded questions to a skewed sample population.
Garbage in garbage out.
When I heard this poll, I smelled a stinker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.