Skip to comments.
Charlie Rose's Thursday Episode on Blogs
The Charlie Rose Show ^
| 2/10/05
| Charlie Rose
Posted on 02/10/2005 5:24:40 PM PST by TheDoctorNoh
EDWARD KENNEDY SENATOR (D-MA)
AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT BLOGS with
GLENN REYNOLDS, University of Tennessee Editor, Instapundit.com ANA MARIE COX, Editor, Wonkette.com ANDREW SULLIVAN, Senior Editor, The New Republic Andrewsullivan.com JOE TRIPPI, Former Campaign Manager for Howard Dean Author, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" / Joetrippi.com
(Excerpt) Read more at charlierose.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: blogs; blogsnobs; charlierose; leftwing; mediaelites
Uhm...a discussion about blogs and not a conservative blogger anywhere to be seen. Wow, Charlie, can you have assembled anymore of a left-leaning group than this?
To: TheDoctorNoh
Is Kennedy going to talk about blogs or will it be something else he knows nothing about?
2
posted on
02/10/2005 5:26:30 PM PST
by
silent_jonny
("Don't he never sleep?")
To: TheDoctorNoh
Maybe Kennedy will be discussing tough new federal DUI legislation. Or maybe he'll discuss drowning young women and how to get away with it.
To: TheDoctorNoh
How pathetic. The subject is supposed to be how the "little guy" is changing journalism, but Rose has on the blogging equivalent of the network news anchors. All famous, all part of the NYC/DC media/politics cocktail party circuit, and all wealthy (except for Cox). Sullivan (who just QUIT his blog, by the way) made about $160,000 last year from his blog. Reynolds makes about $100K. Trippi is paid by MSNBC to be their "blog guru" or somesuch BS. And Cox, while she only makes $20K a year, is the biggest socialite in DC because all the horny politicans can't get enough of the way she shows off her tits in a drunken stupor at every party and how she loves to say "c*ck" in one out of every three blog posts. Plus she is constantly being handed free trips all over the world to talk about blogging, so she might as well be making $100K/yr.
Just more proof that those four have sold out, and the MSM still doesn't get it.
4
posted on
02/10/2005 5:35:07 PM PST
by
Dont Mention the War
(Liberal radio can be summed up in five words: Dead air, um, dead air.)
To: TheDoctorNoh
Ummm.... Since when is Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit a liberal?
To: TheDoctorNoh
Charlie Rose is a great interviewer, but, his liberal loaded guest list has forced me to put on a movie instead of watching his show.
6
posted on
02/10/2005 5:37:35 PM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
To: TheDoctorNoh
JOE TRIPPI, Former Campaign Manager for Howard Dean AuthorMaybe Joe can reveal just how much the Dean campaign paid liberal bloggers to shill for them.
Naaaaah...
7
posted on
02/10/2005 5:38:42 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
To: TheDoctorNoh
Watching Charlie Rose is as interesting as watching a hobo with bad "morning" hair talk about how the country is in shambles...
8
posted on
02/10/2005 5:44:25 PM PST
by
frogjerk
To: conservative in nyc
Ummm.... Since when is Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit a liberal?He's the designated punching bag, the lone conservative brought on to provide "balance." The rest of the panel is about as far left as you can get.
9
posted on
02/10/2005 5:45:17 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
To: crazyhorse691
Charlie Rose is a great interviewerOf what, dust?
10
posted on
02/10/2005 5:45:22 PM PST
by
frogjerk
To: frogjerk
Dust would be immensly better than most of what he has on now.
11
posted on
02/10/2005 5:52:10 PM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
To: crazyhorse691
I'll second that. There are probably six conservative blogs for every liberal one, but true to their balanced programming on PBS, they found all liberals. Why not throw Keith Olbermann into the mix for a little more balance? I understand he has a faux blog now as well.
What really bothers me, though, it that my tax dollars are being wasted on this kind of crap. Simply "turning it off" will not stop your sponsorship of the program.
12
posted on
02/10/2005 5:56:27 PM PST
by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
To: Dont Mention the War
LoL... nice... I liked it..
13
posted on
02/10/2005 6:01:15 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: AZ_Cowboy
This is the left, they would simply lie and state a few of the registered democrat bloggers are really republicans.
To: AZ_Cowboy
Simply "turning it off" will not stop your sponsorship of the program.
Oregon Public Broadcasting, which televises the show, receives no public money. I complain and drop my pledge a little each time. But, leftist Portland (not to mention the industries leftist slant)is the ruling gorilla.
15
posted on
02/10/2005 6:05:22 PM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
To: TheDoctorNoh
It's all well and good to debate whether or not the Instapundit has earned his conservative wings, but I'd be much happier if there were a consarned WORKING LINK to the story!
Thank you very much.
16
posted on
02/10/2005 6:35:47 PM PST
by
BfloGuy
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson