Although this seems directed towards me personally, for arguments' sake I'll go along with you (maybe I shouldn't, but I will).
Naturally that I mold my thought along my own leanings - what's so wrong about that? If you have any other ideas, criticisms, corrections - shoot, spell them out. Do make it into a discourse instead of a veiled attack of my PhD, (envious, or what?) If my premise dosn't hold - go ahead shoot holes into it. But do it directly and openly - I didn't fear to expose my weaker side and my fears - that I wish I never had - but why should I be kidding anybody, least of all - myself.
It is way too complicated to explain in a few succinct statements. Besides, I have clients coming in for the next few hours. I'm sure others will be tackling the issues as well if you hang in there and stay away from the guards.
Sorry if posting a reply to my own reply is against the rules but let me clarify this post a little further (indirectly a response to LadyJAG): This dilemma that I have was born out of the desire for the CURRENT DOMINANCE OF THE RIGHT "RIGHT" in order to sustain its present prominence for our children/grandchildren - so I figured if we bait the hook (the RIGHT WAY) - we may have less of the leftist-liberal headaches in the future, let's win them over somehow... give them a bone here and there (this became a moot point after Monticello's post who splintered me in a 1000 pieces - but it does clarify the motivation - which I would consider reasonably noble - even though it happens to me mine, so I admit to being subjective).