Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: freepatriot32
One thing I wish someone would explain: why any criminal would try to take a gun away from an armed citizen if they could instead leave without risk.

If a would-be rapist finds himself looking down the muzzle of a woman's pistol, he can almost certainly escape unharmed if he turns around and runs away. If he tries to take the woman's pistol, however, he faces a great risk. Even if he were 90% certain of success, that would still mean he had an almost-10% chance of getting killed. Criminals are often not very bright, but one doesn't have to be Einstein to realize it isn't bright to risk one's life when there's no reward even of one "succeeds".

3 posted on 01/03/2005 10:28:43 PM PST by supercat (To call the Constitution a 'living document' is to call a moth-infested overcoat a 'living garment'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

The anti-gun nuts will have to answer to the charge that they might be responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans (mostly women) who were brainwashed into believing that guns are evil. The anti-gun libs routinely accuse conservatives of killing countless innocent Americans by fostering a "gun culture" (in their words). I accuse liberals of killing thousands of Americans (especially women) by leaving them defenseless against murderers. Remember Richard Speck killed eight nurses with a butcher knife... not a gun.


8 posted on 01/04/2005 2:38:22 AM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson