[Soul Seeker]

Legal recognition that Scott Peterson murdered Conner, his unborn son, has unintentionally had the effect of bestowing upon Conner the precious, and heretofore judicially rationed status of “personhood.” You can’t murder a “non-viable mass of tissue.” But now, legally – and always, actually – you can murder an unborn person.

Generally I dislike never ending trial coverage, this is why this case was relevent above the usual celeb trial.

[woodb01]

And Abortion is simply the murdering of a human. It's not a dog, cat, pig, cow, or some other animal...

A human being...

Re-Designed ANTI-DNC Web Portal at --->
http://www.noDNC.com

[andie74]

What is so interesting about the juxtaposition of this article is that on the forum, it comes right before an article about a man and his pregnant wife. In the midst of the tsunami, he saved his wife. He is missing.

The legal precedent here will be great to use in establishing personhood for the unborn. The people have spoken! (Unless, of course, some idiot liberal decides to only give personhood to those unborn babies who are wanted by the mother and/or father).

[OneLoyalAmerican]

You've been pinged baby.

[Jeff Gordon]

a father can kill his unborn child, be convicted of that child’s murder, and himself face the death penalty – while on the same day, a mother can elect to have her unborn child killed

That sums it up quite nicely.

Our current laws allow a female to choose to kill or have killed her unborn child. No one else has this right to murder an unborn child except its female parent (I refuse to call it a mother).

[cpforlife.org]

Excellent article. Much food for thought.

IIRC, Justice O'Conner stated that Roe v Wade is on a collision course with itself because it defies all logic.

“Blackmun invented a right to abortion....Roe had nothing whatever to do with constitutional interpretation. The utter emptiness of the opinion has been demonstrated time and again, but that, too, is irrelevant. The decision and its later reaffirmations simply enforce the cultural prejudices of a particular class in American society, nothing more and nothing less. For that reason, Roe is impervious to logical or historical argument; it is what some people, including a majority of the Justices, want, and that is that. Roe should be overruled and the issue of abortion returned to the moral sense and the democratic choice of the American people. Abortions are killings by private persons. Science and rational demonstration prove that a human exists from the moment of conception. Scalia is quite right that the Constitution has nothing to say about abortion.

Robert H. Bork
Constitutional Persons: An Exchange on Abortion
Robert H. Bork is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C.

Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

[Jaysun]

Our task is to convince mothers not to rip their own infants from the womb to discard them like garbage. Is anyone else astonished that we'll have a hard time making such a case? What a miserable lot we are.

If we don't fight the whores and win we needn't bother praying for forgiveness. Our time would be better spent praying for a more favorable position in the flames.

[PokerGod]

The only reason this trial made the news was because of the double murder issue.

I have a problem with calling it two murders as long as abortion is still legal. How can we say that Scott Peterson is guilty of the baby's murder? A woman who aborts her baby is not guilty of murder. There is a real problem here, and it has to be resolved somehow. It just seems hypocritical.

[topher]

Excerpt from the article:

The “pro-choice” mantra: “It’s the woman’s right to choose!” – “get over your love affair with the fetus!” – “Keep your laws off my body!” [end excerpt]

Of course, Planned Parenthood/NARAL/NOW must have their cake and eat it too. They must force people to use the word CHOICE for baby killing, but those against it are anti-abortion, not pro-life.

If the Pro-Lifers are anti-abortion, then the Pro-Choicers are pro-abortion. Either one set of terms or the other.

But then Margaret Sanger, who authored The Negro Project and with ABCL had very strong ties to Nazi-Germany & the Super-Race effort, gets her own way and so does the organization that she founded.

[theconservativerepublican]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1312130/posts


This article was posted on Saturday.

Thanks

[MHGinTN]

"Conner Peterson, like so many millions of unborn children, had his own body, his own blood type, his own brainwaves, and his own heartbeat. Conner Peterson, like so many millions of unborn children, sucked his thumb, got the hiccups, cried, and smiled in his mother’s womb. Conner Peterson, like so many millions of unborn children, had his own life, his own dreams, and his own future to look forward to. But tragically…Conner Peterson, like so many millions of unborn children, was an inconvenient reality – an “unwanted pregnancy” to a selfish parent. And so, tragically…like so many millions of unborn children – Conner Peterson was murdered." Oh that this truth were favored by the BM (big media) ... abortion would become rare and something to abhor again! [The author appears to have been reading along at FR for sometime, judging by the phrases and position so well presented.]