Gotta love it! The NYT editorial page just cited statistical evidence that completely undercut both the moral and the substantitive point of their daily screed! They should stick to personnal ad hominem and cattiness, they do that so much better.
To: .cnI redruM
Pity they couldn't be bothered to get their collective shorts in a knot over Oil For Food.
2 posted on
12/30/2004 6:52:45 AM PST by
mewzilla
To: .cnI redruM
Complete and BOLD-faced liars. Detestable.
3 posted on
12/30/2004 6:55:48 AM PST by
SE Mom
(God Bless our troops.)
To: .cnI redruM
Add $200 Billion we spent to bring justace and freedom to the Middle East.
Add about $1 Trillion we spend each year to secure the world from aggression
5 posted on
12/30/2004 7:17:24 AM PST by
elfman2
To: .cnI redruM
Maybe if other nations spent half of what we spend to maintain world security, we could further increase our lead over them in humanitarian spending.
7 posted on
12/30/2004 7:20:19 AM PST by
elfman2
To: .cnI redruM
niggardly? The NYT using that word? What was their position on the person who was fired for using that word?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson