That would also destroy the rule of law, every bit as much as the Mass. Supremos did.
One more time: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS AN OXYMORON!
The word, marriage, is already defined. Neither the courts, nor congress, nor the people have the right to destroy the definition of a word that is already legally and socially defined across continents and cultures.
If you allow it, you allow any word to be changed at the whim of any majority vote.
You're asking for chaos.
Same-sexers need to get their own word. Hijacking the word, marriage, is comparable to the islamofascists highjacking the word, Islam -- (assuming it really IS a peaceful religion.)
Asking for chaos?
No, I am not. I just see no way for the proposed Federal Cons. Amend to pass. There are too many Senators and Rep's hiding behind the "this is a states right issue", when they are just doing that...hiding.
With this Amendment there would be no where for them to hide. They would have to support it, or be exposed as liars.
As well, the purpose of this thread is to expose the "that's majority rule tyranny" when the courts engage in majority rule tyranny all the time.
I would rather have majority rule by the people than by the courts, and I am showing a way for people to get just that.
Its time to crush the power of the courts who have consistently given the numerical minority what they want and have spit in the faces of the numerical majority on issues like abortion, evolution, etc.... This will do just that.
Asking for chaos?
No, I am not. I just see no way for the proposed Federal Cons. Amend to pass. There are too many Senators and Rep's hiding behind the "this is a states right issue", when they are just doing that...hiding.
With this Amendment there would be no where for them to hide. They would have to support it, or be exposed as liars.
As well, the purpose of this thread is to expose the "that's majority rule tyranny" when the courts engage in majority rule tyranny all the time.
I would rather have majority rule by the people than by the courts, and I am showing a way for people to get just that.
Its time to crush the power of the courts who have consistently given the numerical minority what they want and have spit in the faces of the numerical majority on issues like abortion, evolution, etc.... This will do just that.
Asking for chaos?
No, I am not. I just see no way for the proposed Federal Cons. Amend to pass. There are too many Senators and Rep's hiding behind the "this is a states right issue", when they are just doing that...hiding.
With this Amendment there would be no where for them to hide. They would have to support it, or be exposed as liars.
As well, the purpose of this thread is to expose the "that's majority rule tyranny" when the courts engage in majority rule tyranny all the time.
I would rather have majority rule by the people than by the courts, and I am showing a way for people to get just that.
Its time to crush the power of the courts who have consistently given the numerical minority what they want and have spit in the faces of the numerical majority on issues like abortion, evolution, etc.... This will do just that.
This "Definition of Marriage" argument is ridiculous. I don't care what it's called, I don't want my tax money supporting a lifestyle that is a choice.
That's the issue here.
As for SCOTUS, I think that a if a referendum can be overturned, like when the people voted against gay marriage in California in 2001 or 2002, then why not overturn who we elect, since our electors "know better?"