Skip to comments.
US expels terrorist TV network
Danny Taggart's Blogarama ^
| 12/21/2004
| Danny Taggart
Posted on 12/21/2004 1:44:34 AM PST by billybudd
Shawn Macomber talks about the State Department's designation of the al-Manar TV network as a terrorist organization. He describes some of the typical fare on al-Manar, worthy of Borat no doubt:
The popular game show, "The Mission," allows the home viewing audience to cheer on contestants as they "recapture" land stolen by the Jews. For every correct answer a contestant answers about the American-Zionist conspiracy, he or she (Oh, who are we kidding here? He!) moves that much closer on a giant map to Jerusalem. In between singing the praises of suicide bombers and denunciations of Jews, the show's host manages to get in some of the standard game show chit-chat. The first contestant to reach 60 points stands atop the holy city and receives a check for $3,000 while the Hezbollah anthem plays in the background -- "Jerusalem is ours and we are coming to it."
Now, I find it difficult to believe that Hizballah actually generates revenue by airing this hogwash in the US. It's value is primarily to provide an indoctrination channel for potentially disloyal American Muslims. However, these people are few, and the chance that they would be incited to anything by al-Manar's programming is small. Therefore, I believe that the negatives of al-Manar are clearly outweighed by the sardonic entertainment most Americans would get by watching it.
In all seriousness though, it seems like an unnecessary move. Why should we be afraid to let the terrorists have a channel to spout their crazy ideas? This kind of reaction only serves to reinforce the idea that the terrorists are fighting us in the realm of ideas. Let's dispel that notion by letting Americans see exactly what lunatics these people really are. Masking the face of evil allows the government to present an ideologically sanitized version of The Enemy, but it does not serve our purpose in the War on Terror. It is essential, as the saying goes, to know thy enemy.
Although I'm not sure the First Amendment applies in this case (al-Manar is a foreign organization), I find the reasoning behind the State Department's decision somewhat disconcerting. The Department of State condemned al-Manar broadcasts on December 9 when deputy spokesman Adam Ereli said it airs "disgusting programming that preaches violence and hatred" and ideas antithetical to American values.
Hmm, I thought the reason, according to the Patriot Act, was that al-Manar "incite[s] to commit...a terrorist activity." What's all this business about "ideas antithetical to American values"? Of course incitement to terrorist activities is antithetical to American values, but so are many other noncriminal forms of speech, depending on how you define American values (wow, can't believe I just said "noncriminal forms of speech"). Who knows what media the government will consider tomorrow as preachers of hatred? It's exactly these kinds of official statements that make me nervous: the ones in which the government's current action is completely justified, yet use language potentially leading to completely unjustified actions.
TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: almanar; hezbollah; hizballah; statedepartment; terrorism; terrorist
1
posted on
12/21/2004 1:44:34 AM PST
by
billybudd
To: billybudd
Why should we be afraid to let the terrorists have a channel to spout their crazy ideas?
If he spent 10 minutes over at DU,he wouldn't need to ask this question.
2
posted on
12/21/2004 2:08:29 AM PST
by
loboinok
(GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOU AIM AT.)
To: loboinok
This is exactly the point. We would never consider banning DU regardless of how dumb they sound. Instead, we post the DUmmie FUnnies and make fun of them endlessly.
3
posted on
12/21/2004 9:01:20 AM PST
by
billybudd
To: loboinok
My point was, minds like that are easily influenced.Once you get em thinking a certain way, you can get em acting or reacting.
Case in point was the McCarthy era.Present day Hollywood is a good example of Hollywood not being thoroughly purged of Communism.The Hollywood set convinced the public and Politicians that they were being wrongfully persecuted (victimized) and the hearings and prosecutions ceased, allowing communism to grow unchecked.It was too hot of a political potatoe for anyone to touch. Like any cancer, it came back strong as ever.
4
posted on
12/21/2004 12:32:19 PM PST
by
loboinok
(GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOU AIM AT.)
To: billybudd
My point was, minds like that are easily influenced.Once you get em thinking a certain way, you can get em acting or reacting.
Case in point was the McCarthy era.Present day Hollywood is a good example of Hollywood not being thoroughly purged of Communism.The Hollywood set convinced the public and Politicians that they were being wrongfully persecuted (victimized) and the hearings and prosecutions ceased, allowing communism to grow unchecked.It was too hot of a political potatoe for anyone to touch. Like any cancer, it came back strong as ever.
Sorry, posted to myself.
5
posted on
12/21/2004 12:41:25 PM PST
by
loboinok
(GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOU AIM AT.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson