[CaptIsaacDavis]

THe source URL is cited in the article. It's not the New Republican Archive. The piece just largely chronicled various stories you can get online.

[SittinYonder]

Right. I got that. But somebody, somewhere, paraphrased those sources cited throughout the article and cut selected information (paragraphs) from the original articles. Apparently, but perhaps not, that was New Republican Archive. Without going in and reading each article cited to see what information wasn't included or what context may have been lost, I was asking if you knew anything about New Republican Archive. There's a pretty hard push from the Dems to make Kerik look bad, and I'm interested to know the agenda of a source I've never seen before.

[SittinYonder]

President Bush’s nominee to head the Department of Homeland Security, Bernard Kerik, has done a tremendous job in spinning a life grounded in mediocrity and elevated through cronyism, into the PR illusion of a heroic march for "security."

For example, this appears to be the opinion of someone (as best as I can tell) unidentified from New Republican Archive. Is it your opinion that this is a credible source for information? Do you have much familiarity with them?