Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hermann the Cherusker
And that the SA was kicked out because they were getting requests from less savory groups that they did not want soliciting on their property.

Funny how I can't recall ever seeing any "less savory groups" in front of Wal-Mart, K-Mart, the grocery, or any of the countless other stores which somehow found a way to let the SA ring its bells outside their doors. Maybe it's a pre-emptive strike by Target.

Regardless, I have no problem if Target or anyone else chooses to ban the bell-ringers from their property, since they apparently have no problem with the inevitable, negative consequences.

No big deal, though. Target's a chick store.

11 posted on 12/06/2004 10:37:19 AM PST by newgeezer (...until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
It's apparent to Target's way of thinking that the "less savory groups" in front of the other stores are customers.

Target wants to project an air of urbane sophistication; they can do without patronage from the sort of working class Christians who actually care about their fellow man.

21 posted on 12/06/2004 10:55:23 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Are all of you who are boycotting Target saying that you can't envision some "unsavory" group suing Target, K-Mart, or any other store or mall so that they can also set up shop outside the entrance like the Salvation Army does? I certainly can. In fact, I'm shocked that they haven't yet.


29 posted on 12/06/2004 11:24:59 AM PST by LegionofDorkness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson