[balrog666]

would an internationally known Professor of Economics not have considered these thing before putting his name on the line?

Yes. Obviously. Indubitably. Buy a clue, will ya?

and finally, does this or that argument mean that we should all continue to pay 70 TIMES more tax than we have to?

You can't seriously believe this horsesh!t, can you?

If the same amount of money (that's what "revenue neutral" means) will be collected, and our taxes "fall" under this proposal, just who do you think will be paying the difference?

[kevkrom]

You gotta know the APT proposal stinks when the typically tooth-and-nails pro-NRST and anti-NRST folks are both agreeing about how bad it is...

:)