Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SouthernBreeze

It doesn't matter how small it is, the implementation of it would put in place a horrible system of full government control.

I would also like to point out that the income tax, when first introduced was also miniscule. But once the system is there, all the government has to do is keep increasing it.


58 posted on 12/05/2004 11:10:45 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion

History of the 16th Amendment
by W. Cleon Skousen

http://www.wealth4freedom.com/16thHistory.htm

EXCERPT:

"When the first income tax was sent out to the people, the Congress chortled confidently that "all good citizen will willingly and cheerfully support and sustain this, the fairest and cheapest of all taxes." That was the cute little monkey part. After all, the first tax ranged from merely 1% on the first $20,000 of taxable income and was only 7% on incomes above $500,000. Who could complain?(Ed. note: In 1994 "dollars" that $20K is now over $250K and the $500K is today over $6 million!)

At first, scarcely anyone did. Little did they know that before the tinkering was done in Washington, this system would be described by many Americans as the most unfair and expensive tax in the history of the nation. Within a few years, it had become the principal source of income for the federal government.

In the beginning, hardly anyone had to file a tax return because the tax did not apply to the vast majority of America's work-a-day citizens. For example, in 1939, 26 years after the Sixteenth Amendment was adopted, only 5% of the population, counting both taxpayers and their dependents, was required to file returns. Today, more than 80% of the population is under the income tax.

Withholding Taxes

The collection process was greatly facilitated in 1943 by a device created by FDR to pay the costs of WWII. It was called "withholding from wages and salaries". In other words, the tax was collected at the payroll window before it was even due to be paid by the taxpayer. Economists point out that this device, more than any other single factor, shifted the tax from its original design as a tax on the wealthy to a tax on the masses--mostly the middle class. "

===


60 posted on 12/05/2004 11:13:27 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson